|
New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program
Johne’s disease in Cattle - Article 1
This is the first article in a series presenting current information
regarding Johne’s disease in cattle and directed toward helping
veterinarians and their clients prevent or control this disease. It was
adapted by permission from the original 1999-2000 series presented by the AABP
Food Safety Committee. Content was edited and reviewed by the National Johne’s
Working Group and endorsed by the USAHA .
Clinical Description and
Epidemiology of Johne’s Disease in Cattle
Initially prepared and edited by Don Hansen and Christine
Rossiter of the AABP Food Safety Committee
Host range
In cattle, Johne's disease is an infectious bacterial disease primarily
affecting the intestinal tract and associated lymph nodes of ruminants. Johne’s
disease should be viewed as a herd problem as well as an individual animal
problem because much of the infection is subclinical in nature. Infection is
common in domestic ruminant species and has been reported in many species of
captive, free-ranging, and exotic ruminants world-wide i.e., cattle, sheep,
goats, deer, mtn. goat, elk, antelope. Pathology and signs do vary across
species. Isolated cases have been reported in nonruminants including, horses,
rabbits, and nonhuman primates, but these species are not believed to be
significant reservoirs of Johne’s disease.
Isolation of the bacteria or components of its genetic DNA from people with
Crohn’s disease (CD) are reported but the significance as related to CD
remains to be determined.
The causal agent
Johne’s disease is caused by a mycobacterium called Mycobacterium
avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map). It is a distant relative
of the bacteria Mycobacterium bovis, tuberculosis and leprae
that cause TB in humans and animals and leprosy in humans. Map does not
cause TB or leprosy. Map is very similar to another Mycobacterium
called Mycobacterium avium. One genetic feature that separates Map
from M. avium is copies of a unique DNA element named IS900. DNA probe
detection of the IS900 unit is also used to identify Map infection.
After ingestion, Map bacteria are taken up by intestinal mucosal
cells, especially in Peyer’s patches in the ileum, and immediately engulfed
by resident macrophages. Map multiplies slowly within the macrophage and if
infection is successful it manages to destroy the macrophage and continue to
multiply. Map has clever ability to evade the immune response of the
macrophage even after it is turned on. However, not all infections are
successful and the immune response in some exposed individuals prevents
progression of the initial infection. These mechanisms are largely unknown but
do involve dose and number of exposures, strain, immune biology of the
individual etc. As organisms multiply they are released and excreted in the
feces, which leads to contamination and their accumulation in the animal’s
environment, feed and water.
The primary source of contamination and exposure to Johne’s disease that
leads to infection is directly from infected animals who are multiplying and
shedding the bacteria. The organism does not multiply once it is outside the
animal but it is well protected by its’ cell wall and can survive a year or
more in most moderate environments. It is more susceptible to degrading by
ultraviolet, heat, and drying.
Signalment of disease
It must be emphasized that, because of the slowly progressive nature of
the infection, signs of Johne’s disease may not be seen until years after
initial infection . Cattle may be infected for years before they
show any signs of disease.
When they finally do occur, the signs of Johne’s disease are intermittent
bouts of diarrhea, which eventually becomes chronic, accompanied by weight loss
and typically a good appetite. Some infected animals initially just appear
unthrifty. Affected cattle do not generally have a fever. The signs of this
disease can easily be confused with several other diseases. The development of
noticeable signs may occur with stressful events such as calving, feed changes,
relocation, etc. There is some data to suggest that subclinical stages may
result in a decline in performance, especially in milk production in the last
lactation before culling.
Causes of clinical signs
Mycobacteria are taken up by specialized cells (M cells) in the ileum. M
cells present the bacteria to macrophages and lymphocytes in Peyer’s
patches. The cellular immune system reacts to the invasion by recruiting more
macrophages and lymphocytes to the site. Lymphocytes release a variety of
cytokines, which enhance the bacterial killing ability of the macrophages.
Macrophages fuse into large cells and with lymphocytes infiltrate infected
tissues in large numbers. This leads to the granulomatous thickening of the
intestine. In later phases of the immune response, bacteria escape macrophages
into the intestinal lumen and animals begin to shed Map in feces.
Eventually the bacteria also escape into the vascular system which stimulates
antibody. This humoral immunity however does not play a significant role in
controlling Map because of its intracellular localization.
Figure 1 .
A graph showing hypothetical concentrations of mycobacteria and antibodies
through stages of infection. Horizontal line suggests test detection level.
Ultimately the body’s ineffective immune response to Map yields a
combination of factors which contribute to the development of clinical disease
in an individual. The factors are poorly understood but involve the
inflammation and impaired nutrient absorption from the intestine, interaction
of systemic and gut immune components, and the eventual collapse of the
cellular immune response allowing the unhindered proliferation of the
infection.
When to suspect a herd is infected
The obvious answer is a herd exhibiting cows with chronic diarrhea and/or
weight loss in the face of good appetites. However, some animals may be
infected, appear normal and be culled before they show any clinical signs. So,
some owners may never realize their herd is infected. A complaint in these
herds could be that herd production not as high as it should be.
In attempting to find the cause of low herd production, tests for Johne’s
disease on several poor-doing animals would be advised. In other herds, owners
may see one or more cows with diarrhea or weight loss and suspect Johne’s
disease as a possible cause. In chronically infected herds, for each animal
with clinical disease there may be five to 15 other animals with subclinical
infection and no signs of Johne’s disease at all. See figure 2.
Explaining asymptomatic infection
Johne’s is an infectious disease which typically passes through four
stages. These stages help explain why infected animals appear healthy for so
long and diagnostic tests can’t detect early infection. (Figure 1) Stage I
is the initial infection: the animal is infected, not showing signs of
disease, and not likely to be shedding bacteria into the environment. The
stage is not detectable by diagnostic tests. In Stage II, the infection is
progressing but the animal still does not show any clinical signs. The
organism however may begin to be excreted in high enough numbers to be
detected by fecal culture but only the exception will have antibody detectable
by serology. These animals begin to be infectious to animals in contact.
Animals in Stage III show early signs of disease and many diagnostic tests
detect infected animals as positive. Stage IV is the obvious clinical
end-stage of infection. It is readily recognized, terminal, and most animals
are positive on most diagnostic tests.
Figure 2.
Stages of Johne’s disease progression. For each animal in Stage IV, the
hypothetical animals in other Stages are in parentheses.

In herd with established Johne’s disease, animals are present in all four
stages of disease. Depending on the degree of infection and spread, each
animal that develops clinical Johne’s disease (Stage IV) may represent five
to 15 animals in other stages of infection and not showing signs.
Common sources of infection
- The most common source of infection is feces or manure.
Except
under unusual circumstances infection begins in the first few months of life.
Animals become more resistant with age, though resistance is never complete.
If given a sufficiently large dose of the bacteria adults can become infected.
Nevertheless, under normal animal husbandry conditions, exposure to such large
doses probably rarely occurs. This means, for example, that an infected adult
dairy cow in a stanchion or tie-stall barn is not going to infect the cow
standing next to her. Infected cows are primarily the main source of infection
for calves. In a beef herd, large doses of pathogens may be deposited on
ground-fed forages thus increasing the risk for other animals and especially
youngstock.
The vast majority of infections in young animals are acquired by ingestion
of the bacteria. This happens accidentally when they consume manure containing
the bacteria. Suckling manure contaminated teats, licking contaminated bars in
the stall where they are born, or being housed in a location where they have
access to manure from the adult herd are ways young animals have opportunities
to ingest this microbe.
Johne’s disease typically enters a herd when infected, but
healthy-looking, animals come in. As the disease progresses in that animal,
the frequency and number of bacteria being excreted increase. Every day,
billions of Johne’s microbes may be excreted from an animal in Stage III or
IV of the disease. The infection spreads to calves and herd mates without the
owner's knowledge. Eventually signs of the disease may be recognized in one or
more animals.
- Another source of infection is milk and colostrum from infected
dams.
The likelihood of Johne’s bacteria being excreted in milk of
infected females increases as the disease progresses. Studies suggest that 36%
of Stage III and IV cows could have Johne’s microbes in their colostrum and
milk. In beef herds, where calves remain with their mothers and nurse daily,
the chance for transmission of the infection through colostrum and milk is
high. These bacteria may be excreted directly through the mother's milk or, it
might be present in manure of the teats, udder or anywhere calves may attempt
to suckle.
- In-utero exposure may be a source of infection for calves.
It
is possible for a fetus to become infected in-utero if the dam is in
the later stages of disease. Studies have shown that, in disease Stages III
and IV in the dam, 8% to 40% of fetuses were infected from their mothers in-utero.
Infected fetuses can abort, or they can be born and not display their
infection until they are adults. How in-utero infections affect
diagnostic tests on those animals that survive to adulthood is not known. Risk
for infection of the fetus is low from mothers in disease Stages I and II.
Water and feed. Water or forages that are contaminated with
manure from infected animals are additional potential sources of infection.
These sources are not well quantified and their risk must be assessed by
estimating the degree of contamination, prevalence of infected animals, and age
susceptibility of exposed animals. Potential sources to consider include
shallow, stagnant water sources, forages contaminated during delivery or
feeding, poorly drained bogs, over-grazed or heavily manure-contaminated
pasture, hay crops sprayed with lagoon waste from infected herds, etc.
Is Map a zoonotic concern?
A debate has developed over the last 15 years as to whether or not Map
could play are role in causing human Crohn’s Disease (CD). CD in people is a
chronic inflammatory disease of the intestinal tract and in that way bears
some resemblance to Johne’s disease in ruminants. CD is most prevalent in
the northern, more industrialized regions of Europe and North America. Its
incidence has trended upward over the last four decades. CD typically affects
younger people, from adolescence to 35 years old and an quarter to half
million people in the US are estimated to suffer from CD. The cause of CD is
still to be discovered, but is believed to involve multiple factors including
genetic predisposition plus exposure to some environmental or infectious
factor(s).
It is generally agreed that CD is the consequence of the intestinal immune
system over-responding to some stimulus. Map, other infectious agents,
and bacterial or allergic components of the normal intestinal stream are all
hypothesized as potential factors in initiating or prolonging the immune
inflammatory response in CD. Anti-inflammatory drugs, surgical removal of
affected intestine, immunomodulating agents, and multi-antibiotic regimens are
all used to reduce the inflammation in CD. There is no cure however and
individuals with CD alternate periods of remission with flare-up for life.
Current evidence is inadequate to determine health risk
Current evidence cannot support or reject a causal relationship between Map
and CD. Associations do not offer much guidance about the causal relationship
between two factors. CD is a complex disease and extensive research will
ultimately be needed to resolve the question of its cause. The proposed
associations with Map are provocative however and have helped highlight
the need for more research into the cause of CD and have caused the cattle
industry to be more concerned about Johne’s as a potential food safety
issue. Some of the issues surrounding a possible association between Map
and CD are summarized below.
Map DNA in CD patients’ tissues
DNA detection methods have permitted researchers to look for the presence Map
in tissue samples by identifying a unique genetic (DNA) component of the
bacteria. Several studies in the last decade have reported finding Map
DNA in intestinal tissues taken from CD patients a higher percent of the time
than from tissues from control patients with intestinal diseases other than
CD. Overall results are conflicting, however, since a near equivalent number
of studies have reported different findings including no Map DNA in CD
or non-CD patients, Map similarly present in both groups, and other Mycobacteria
also present in each group.
Map bacteria cultured from a few Crohn’s patients
Successful attempts to grow Map from CD patient specimens are rare
and the 6 to 8 reported isolations required months or years of incubation. If Map
is present in human tissue, proponents of the association suggest that it
exists in low numbers and in an adapted form. This form does not grow in the
laboratory and lacks a cell wall, which explains why it also cannot be
visualized by standard microbiologic methods.
Does milk pasteurization kill Map?
Epidemiologic studies have not offered much evidence for specific factors
that could be associated with CD, including milk consumption. However, Map
has been cultured from cows with clinical Johne’s disease, thus the role of
milk as a possible exposure factor has been considered. In 1996, UK
researchers reported that Map DNA was detected in 7% of samples
collected in a survey of retail milk samples. Identification of Map DNA
does not indicate how much is present or whether the bacteria is living or
not. Subsequently, US and UK researchers conducted experiments on milk samples
spiked with Map to determine if current high-temperature, short-time (HTST,
72C for 15 seconds) milk pasteurization procedures were adequate to kill Map.
Results were conflicting using different methods.
US studies used a turbulent flow lab-scale commercial pasteurizer and
reported 100% kill of Map. UK researchers used a holder tube method and
showed survival of low numbers of organisms. In 1998, FDA reviewed the data
and stated that commercial HTST pasteurization in the U.S. eliminates the
hazard from raw milk products. The batch holder method used by UK researchers
is argued to provide less efficient heating than commercial methods.
The UK Food Standards Agency commissioned an investigation of the Map
in 1000 retail milk samples, by DNA and culture. In efforts to resolve the
pasteurization controversy, investigators have focused on improving detection
of Map by combining techniques to concentrate and grow Map with DNA
detection. Full results of the UK study are anticipated in 2001 and
preliminary reports indicate that viable Map have been recovered from a
small percent of raw and retail milk samples. The Food Standards Agency, an
independent advisory board in the UK, did not recommend changes in advice on
milk consumption or pasteurization procedures but will next actively explore
all possible controls to reduce the risk of exposure to Map while
research on the association with CD continues.
A case of Map before Crohn’s
A 1998 published medical case reported the story of a young boy who
developed CD five years after being evaluated for enlarged lymph nodes and
possible TB. Reevaluation of the original lymph nodes after CD was diagnosed
revealed that the DNA IS900 sequence, which is unique to Map, was
present with other Mycobacteria in the lymph nodes. This is the only reported
case of Map being demonstrated prior to the development of CD.
Multiple antibiotics may help in Crohn’s
Clinical trials are underway to analyze the effect of treatment with
multi-antibiotic regimens on remission of signs and disappearance of CD
inflammation. Some patients on long term anti-mycobacterial and broad spectrum
antibiotics have had extended periods of remission and reduced symptoms for up
to four years after treatment. Typical remissions in CD are months to a couple
of years. If antibiotic treatments were curative, it would support that a
bacterial organism(s) may be at least partially responsible for CD symptoms.
Epidemiologic data not helpful about cause
There have been many epidemiological studies conducted on CD, but none have
examined specific Map exposure factors such as direct contact with animals
that could have Johne’s disease. The following are examples of some of the
more interesting associations that have been reported but have not shed much
light on possible causes for CD:
- a US study in one state reported a geographic overlap between diagnosed
CD patients and dense dairy cattle areas
-a "hot spot" of CD in the UK exists in a region where water
supplies can be contaminated by ag-runoff from cattle operations.
- the incidence of CD has a north-south gradient, being highest in
northern regions of Europe and North America (highly industrialized
countries). Incidence in these regions may now be leveling off but
increasing in southern regions.
- Sweden has one of the highest incidences of CD and one of the lowest of
Johne’s disease.
- family members have a higher risk of CD, which supports a similarity in
both genetics and or exposure to some factor.
Note:
Information for this article has been reviewed by the National Johne’s Working
Group, a subcommittee of the Johne’s Committee of the U. S. Animal Health
Association. Some of this material has been adapted with the kind permission of
Michael Collins, Univ. of Wisconsin, at the Johne's Information Center, also
found at web site http://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/pbs/johnes/.
This document has been slightly modified from the original NYSCHAP document by
Dr. Rossiter and for posting here by Dr. Gay.
|