January 13, 2006To
the WSVMA Membership:
Recently, there has been important news of a dog food recall for products
manufactured at a Gaston, South Carolina plant by Diamond Pet Foods.
Importantly, as of 1-13-06, there has been no contaminated pet food related to
this issue discovered in Washington or Oregon and it is highly unlikely there
will be.
On 1-12-06, I discussed this issue with: Dr. Patricia Talcott , MS, DVM, PhD,
DABVT, Veterinary Toxicologist with the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic
Laboratory, and WSU Associate Professor; Dr. Stan Casteel, DVM, PhD,, Professor
of Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia,
MO 65205, 573-882-6811 Casteels@missouri.edu , and R. Craig Wilson, Vice
President, Food Safety and Quality Assurance, with Costco Wholesale. On 1-13-06,
I discussed the matter with Dr. Jerry R. Heidel, DVM, PhD, Professor and
Director, Oregon State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory,
541-737-6964, Jerry.Heidel @ oregonstate.edu.
A person with ill and at least one dead animal in a neighboring state has
posted allegations by email and it has appeared online alleging a connection
between the aflatoxin contamination and recall occurring in the eastern U.S. and
pet foods sold under the Kirkland brand name by Costco stores in the Pacific
Northwest. Furthermore, the person alleges that Diamond manufactures pet
foods sold under the Kirkland brand and that company officials are withholding
that information.
Diamond does indeed manufacturer pet foods for Kirkland and company officials
readily conveyed that information when asked.
At WSU we have not seen any samples come in related to this issue requesting
testing for aflatoxin. There have been several interested parties contact
us for sample submission. We are encouraging all concerned parties that
contact us to see the following websites as they provide in-depth information
and a format for contact/complaints with Diamond Pet Foods:
Diamond Pet Foods web site
http://www.diamondpetrecall.net/index.html
Cornell University diagnostic lab website
http://diaglab.vet.cornell.edu/news/aflatoxin.asp
Those who still believe that they have contaminated pet food need to keep the
food and its original packaging with lot numbers and freeze it until it can be
tested for the presence of aflatoxin. As with most diagnostic testing, the
better the samples are preserved and the sooner the samples are tested increases
the likelihood for the most accurate, repeatable results. The Washington
Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (509-335-9696) currently tests samples for
a $20 fee in-state and $40 for out-of-state submissions.
Here is Dr. Casteel’s response to me by email after our phone call :
As a precautionary measure, Diamond Pet Foods announced a voluntary recall on
December 20, 2005; casting a wide safety net to prevent pet exposure to
potentially unsafe food. The original recall included 18 products which have
subsequently gone through extensive sampling and testing for aflatoxin.
Aflatoxin has been found in less than 1.5% of Diamond's recalled
products following 2700 dog food sample analyses done by independent
laboratories specializing in aflatoxin testing. Specifically, Diamond is now
more focused on further testing of Diamond Premium Adult and Diamond Maintenance
dog foods based on testing results of the last two weeks. Diamond's website
(www.Diamondpet.com) has a list of all recalled products and those not on the
recall. Refunds and replacement of products have been offered to all customers.
Owners and veterinarians need to be aware that recalled products are limited
to certain states selling products on the recalled list. These are states served
by the production facility in Gaston, South Carolina. Any states west of the
Mississippi plus Illinois and Wisconsin are not affected by the recall. States
west of the Mississippi receive Diamond products manufactured in Meta, Missouri
and Lathrop, California. The actual source of the aflatoxin is from a lot
of corn grown under drought-stricken regions of the Southeastern U.S.
[Information in brackets inserted by Charlie Powell, Public Information
Officer, WSU College of Veterinary Medicine--Also, please note that according to
Mr. Wilson at Costco, the dog food formulations produced by Diamond for the
Kirkland brand are lamb and rice formulations and do not contain corn.
Some of the cat food products sold under the Kirkland brand do contain small
amounts of corn but again were not manufactured in the South Carolina facility
with the contaminated corn. Samples of Diamond foods manufactured in the
western U.S. nonetheless have tested negative for aflatoxin. The testing
was done exclusively as a precaution by both Diamond and Costco on the
ingredients as well as the finished rations. It is not practical
economically to ship feed corn across the U.S. to formulate pet food rations so
it not reasonable to assume contaminated corn from the southeastern U.S. somehow
made its way to California or Missouri for ration formualtion and distribution
in the western U.S. Finally, based upon Costco’s sales and consumption
rate estimates, most if not all of the cat food manufactured during the same
time period in question has been consumed without any reported illness, death,
or aflatoxin contamination.
While issues in medicine should never be declared impossible, it is highly
improbable that Kirkland brand cat foods sold in Washington or Oregon could be
contaminated with aflatoxin related to the recall by Diamond as speculated on
Internet postings. WSU’s veterinary college recommends that in the case of
clients who remain concerned about aflatoxin contamination, submission of
samples and testing may provide the greatest piece-of-mind. In all cases,
clients with ill animals should seek the care of their regular veterinarian.
CP]
Not all dogs exposed to aflatoxin will develop liver disease. Just like with
any toxic exposure, development of aflatoxicosis is a dose-related effect. Some
dogs that develop liver disease will recover and those exposed to large doses
for extended periods may not recover. In an attempt to help with these tragic
losses, Diamond has hired 24 veterinarians led by a board certified veterinary
toxicologist to operate a recall center and gather the medical case information
to ascertain if pet illnesses are related to aflatoxin in dog food. In cases
where owners have retained pet food samples, they are instructed to send samples
with label information (lot number and best before dates) to independent testing
labs for aflatoxin analysis. If the product is part of the recall listing and
Diamond receives a copy of the test report, they will pay the testing cost.
Speculation about the effects of low-dose exposure and the long-term effects
in dogs recovering from toxic exposures are widespread on the Internet. Since
many of these statements are unsupported by the scientific literature we
recommend caution in their use and reliability. Based on a review of the
scientific literature dealing with aflatoxicosis in dogs, the minimum toxic
level in dog food is 60 ppb. This level of aflatoxin exposure requires
continuous consumption for several weeks to months in order for signs of liver
dysfunction to appear. Other articles have suggested the toxic level in dog food
is in the 100-300ppb range and requires continuous exposure/consumption for
several weeks to months. No information is available to suggest that recovered
dogs will later succumb to an aflatoxin-induced disease.
There is no specific antidote for aflatoxicosis. Symptomatic and
supportive care tailored to the severity of the liver disease may include
intravenous fluids with dextrose, active vitamin K, B-vitamins, and a
restricted, but high quality protein diet, with adequate carbohydrate content.
Posted on Wednesday, Jan 11th 2006
Contaminated Diamond Pet Food Products and "Best By" Dates Narrowed
Based on analytical sampling of finished product lots retained by Diamond Pet
Foods, the company has been able to narrow products and "Best By" dates affected
by aflatoxin.
Testing of more than 2,700 finished product samples conducted by independent
laboratories confirms that only Diamond Maintenance Dog and Diamond Premium
Adult Dog with "Best By" dates of April 3, April 4, April 5, and April 11, 2007,
are potentially toxic. These products also will have a capital "G" (in reference
to the company's Gaston, S.C., facility) in the 11th or 12th position of the
date code (18 lb. to 55 lb. bags). The capital "G" will be in the 9th position
on smaller 4 lb. to 8 lb. bags.
Test results for all other products have not been toxic.
As a proactive precautionary measure, Chicken Soup for the Pet Lover's Soul and
Premium Edge brands have been tested and are negative for aflatoxin. It is
important for consumers to note that Chicken Soup for the Pet Lover's Soul and
Premium Edge brands are not included in the product recall.
"This testing will help our customers better identify products affected," said
Mark Brinkmann, chief operations officer, Diamond Pet Foods.
Brinkmann also stressed that products included in the original voluntary recall
should be returned to retailers. For complete information on the product recall,
please refer to the company's Web site, www.diamondpet.com.
On December 21, Diamond Pet Foods initiated a voluntary recall of all products
containing corn produced at its Gaston, S.C., facility and distributed to 23
states in the eastern U.S. The only states affected by the recall are Alabama,
Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, West
Virginia, Vermont and Virginia.
Charlie Powell, Public Information Officer and Public Information Director
WSVMA
College of Veterinary Medicine
Washington State University
Pullman, WA 99164-7010
phone 509-335-7073 (all hours)
fax 509-335-2132